Lori Vallow Daybell Demands Trial Redo in EXPLOSIVE New Motion!

Lori Valow Debel is seeking a new trial on five grounds—jury misconduct, preclusion of witness statements, impermissible expert testimony, discovery violation, and prosecutorial misconduct—but the claims are largely unfounded and reflect her manipulative, narcissistic behavior. 4:00-4:49

Key Takeaways:
• Juror 15 claimed he only learned about Lori’s prior convictions after being dismissed and googling her name—contradicting Lori’s assertion that he received prejudicial information before deliberation. 3:08-3:58
• Tyle Ryan and Alex Cox’s statements were inadmissible hearsay; the state’s objection was proper under Arizona evidence rules, and Lori cannot use them as evidence. 8:27-9:28
• Lori’s request for Charles Valow’s phone data occurred mid-trial, and the judge permitted it with a timeline—no constitutional violation occurred. 14:18-15:31
• Prosecutorial remarks about self-defense and Lori’s religious beliefs were accurate and legally permissible; the jury received self-defense instructions, and Lori’s own defense strategy was allowed. 16:51-22:00
• Judge Bareski required only witness relevancy—not defense strategy—under Arizona rules; her claim of partiality lacks legal merit. 39:35-42:49

Lori’s motion appears to exploit public sympathy and legal loopholes, not represent a legitimate appeal.

Sources:

• 3:08-3:58 Juror 15’s post-verdict statements and timeline of knowledge
• 8:27-9:28 Hearsay objections and inadmissibility of Tyle and Alex Cox statements
• [14:18-15:31](https